India in the Persian World of Letters

This is an open access title available under the terms of a CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licence. It is free to read at Oxford Scholarship Online and offered as a free PDF download from OUP and selected open access locations. This book traces the development of philology (the study of literary language) in the Persian tradition in India, concentrating on its socio-political ramifications. The most influential Indo-Persian philologist
of the eighteenth-century was Sir=aj al-D=in 'Al=i Kh=an, (d. 1756), whose pen-name was =Arz=u. Besides being a respected poet, =Arz=u was a rigorous theoretician of language whose Intellectual legacy was side-lined
by colonialism. His conception of language accounted for literary innovation and historical change in part to theorize the t=azah-go'=i [literally, "fresh-speaking"] movement in Persian literary culture. Although later scholarship has tended to frame this debate in anachronistically nationalist terms (Iranian native-speakers versus Indian imitators), the primary sources show that contemporary concerns had less to do with geography than with the question of how to assess innovative
"fresh-speaking" poetry, a situation analogous to the Quarrel of the Ancients and the Moderns in early modern Europe. =Arz=u used historical reasoning to argue that as a cosmopolitan language Persian could not be the
property of one nation or be subject to one narrow kind of interpretation. =Arz=u also shaped attitudes about reokhtah, the Persianized form of vernacular poetry that would later be renamed and reconceptualized as Urdu, helping the vernacular to gain acceptance in elite literary circles in northern India. This study puts to rest the persistent misconception that Indians started writing the vernacular because they were ashamed of their poor grasp of Persian at the twilight of the Mughal Empire.